Category Archives: Reviews

Quis custudiet ipsos custodes?

Who Watches the Watchmen?

For the non-latin scholars, taken from Juvenal, the quote is roughly translated to mean, “Who watches the Watchmen?” an oft mentioned mentioned quote in the Watchmen trade/movie. I did this past Sunday and came away with a slight sinking feeling. Don’t get me wrong, the movie was solid; the visuals were amazing; acting, for the most part, was good; action scenes, great; plot, good and mainly true to the movie. But… it just wasn’t good enough for me.

Spoiler alert for those who’ve not read the trade/watched the motion comic yet. For those who’ve not read it, a quick summary of the trade is that it follows middle aged has been superheroes in a hunt to find an unknown killer killing off superheroes for seemingly no reason. I’ll try not to reveal so much for those who’ve not watched the movie yet. Condensing a 12 issue arc into a mere 2:45 hr movie that will satisfy both mainstream audiences and hardcore fans of the trade was quite the task. Mainstreamers, coming in expecting your typical flying, high jumping, cheesy save the girl action will be letdown in leaps and bounds. Though Watchmen will be classified by many as a “superhero movie”, it’s more of a movie that happens to have superhero-like figures in it. You’ll not see any cutesy save scenes of teenage angst or someone rekindling a long gone relationship. People actually die in this movie, pretty gory deaths, may I add. There’s your excessive nudity that will have you wondering who was the poor sap that got stuck animating that blue, glowing man-thing that is attached to a bald Data-like naked man and some pretty strong political and philosophical themes going on.

Beginning, with well… the beginning, which was a mix of classic music that retold the past events leading all the way up to the “current” in the Watchmen universe. The beginning was extremely well done and summarized the events pretty well, though I’d have to admit, non-readers of the trade will most likely be confused as there is no text nor is there a narrator, just scenes mixed in with Bob Dylan and Jimi Hendrix. Although the beginning music really messes well with the intro, sadly the music for the rest of the film (other than the organ music from the second trailer) was quite disappointing. I know the director was probably trying to get music to fit the times, but it just didn’t work out most of the time. The music felt really out of place in many of the scenes, throwing off the whatever vibe was going on in the movie.

The next scene opened with the fight between the Comedian and his then unknown killer, which I’d have to say was one of the best fight scenes I’ve seen in a movie in a while. Although I knew exactly what was going to happen, it left me guessing what was going to happen though the “costume” of the mask killer was outlined in such a way that you kinda knew who he was if you had stay passed the hour mark of the movie. It also a mostly logical retelling of how the fight may have went down minus a particularly irksome item that you Watchmen readers will mostly like notice.

The next hour and a half comprised mainly of the retelling of the Comedian’s past and his unlawful acts that lead to his untimely death. This is where I started getting let down by the movie. The casting of the movie was pretty spot on in my opinion, look-wise anyway. All the characters looked like their counterparts to pretty much a T with some compromising changes. But what had me scratching my head was the acting of the Comedian, it just wasn’t… good. He under acted many of the scenes. Maybe it’s because I expected a certain type of reaction, which has been in grained in my memory since the first time I picked up the book, but he just could have done a better job of expressing emotion. the actor who played the Comedian made it seem like he was just reading off the script he read a few minutes beforehand. The acting just could have been better, but was a momental letdown.

On the other hand, Rorscach was a perfect casting, he not only looked the part but acted like I had imagined he would’ve acted. He was the crazy and conspiracy theorist when he should have been, his mannerisms were believable, his sense of justice and matter of speaking were spot on. He definitely wasn’t afraid to be Rorschach, though I definitely would be if I met him. My favorite scene was in the famous prison cafeteria scene where he dosed a fellow prison mate with boiling hot oil, then shouts out, “None of you understand. I’m not locked up in here with you. You’re locked up in here with me.” Amazing, I could watch that scene over and over again and would not get old of it. Though what was missing was the retelling of Rorscach’s origin, which was a gross oversight of the director. He was the character that made the movie stand out; he was the most interesting, most intriguing character and they just left out how he became Rorschach.It was most likely left out in favor of the retelling of the naked super powered blue guy origin. I’m hoping it was just cut because of time, since I hear the movie was cut down from nearly 4 hours to under 3 to be able to get the masses to not leave.

Generally, the movie was a great retelling of the first 5 chapters of the trade and then quickens up after the 2 hour mark to come to a very different ending than what is in the trade. Philosophical-wise, the ending was very similar, but what had me was the blame being turned around and the changing ultimatums in the movie. There was also a very logical sequence change in the movie of the famous Dreiberg/Laurie sex scene, essentially it was moved back in favor of a more “friendly” scene to Rorschach that is.

Watching the movie in IMAX was definitely pretty awesome, but probably not worth it, since I don’t believe any of the film was filmed using IMAX cameras. So if you think you’ll be missing a lot since there are no IMAX theaters in your area, you’ll probably not be missing much. Be warned there is a fair amount of both male and female nudity as well as pretty gruesome deaths and fight scenes, which added a grittiness to the film. The comic with a comic “Tales of the Black Freighter” were unsurprisingly absent, as the animated version will be coming in separately, as well as the book within a book chapters of “Under The Hood”. I honestly can’t wait to buy the spliced in uncut DVD release when it comes out and sit and watch the marathon of a flick.
watchmen_comedian-button

So did I like the movie? Yes, I did. Would I watch it again? Yes.

Apple TV is one of the greatest things to have in a living, that is if you soft-mod it with boxee, the open source media plugin based on the code of the wildly popular (well at least with the geek crowd) XMBC. The Apple TV has always piqued my interest, which is strange it being the least popular Apple product, but back about two months ago when I heard that someone created a way to watch Hulu (albeit a bit chuggy) and other internet content easily on your TV with the Apple TV, I knew it would be the perfect addition to a home entertainment setup that I was planning to create for months. When I found out that I had a friend that had an Apple TV that he wanted to sell, I promptly took it off his hands at the going eBay street price. First thing I did was upgrade it to the latest firmware (Take 2.2) I created a patchstick for it using the ATV-creator with boxee/xmbc preloaded and in minutes (link here for video tutorial on how to make a patchstick with boxee) I was off and running. So what do I think of the Apple TV and boxee? In short, I think both are a almost-killer app and with the recent $4 million in funding this project received, it will only be get better from here on out.

Note: When I initially wrote this review, I had the Take 2.2 firmware on it and not the new 2.3 firmware that Apple pushed out. But when I restarted my Apple TV this weekend, it updated automatically with the 2.3 and effectively killed boxee, but there is already a fix to get it back up and running, which I did today. The new atv-creator patchstick now works under a Windows environment, so I do not have to use my roommate’s Macbook to create a patchstick. One caveat was that I had to use the USB drive image tool from the command line, which was really simple. Link here is to a team boxee member showing how to get boxee back on your ATV.

So after waiting about six months after everyone else (and thems people) in the world got the Bold, AT&T has finally released theirs and I finally got mine. Unfortunately, after spending hours on the phone and speaking to multiple reps on the phone, AT&T refused to offer me a discount on the phone at all if I would re-up until I am 15 months into my contract (I’m currently at roughly a year). You can imagine how disappointed I was at the fact that I told them that I would even re-up for three years to get a discounted rate, but they still refused to budge on the price, merely giving me a $25 credit to my account. So I went ahead and purchased the Bold at the astronomical rate of $550+NY taxes. But enough of the logistics on how I got the hone, here is my review on the BlackBerry Bold.

I knew the title of best electronic purchase that was previously rewarded to my Squeezebox Boom was going to be dethroned one day, but I didn’t know that it was going to be dethroned so soon. I would first like to say that the BlackBerry Bold is my best electronic purchase ever. So after about a week of heavy use, here is my review on this thing. It is kinda long, so by all means read only the sections that matter to you all.

Specs:

  • Size: 4.5″ x 2.6″ x 0.55″
  • Weight: 4.7 ounces
  • Screen: 2.5″, 480×320 pixels, 65K
  • Platform: BlackBerry OS 4.6
  • Memory: 1GB w/microSDHC slot (up to 16GB)

Network:

  • GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 (Quad-Band)
  • WCDMA: 850/1900/2100 (Tri-Band)

Camera:

  • 2 mega-pixels (auto-focus)
  • 5 x Digital Zoom

Audio:

  • MP3, AAC, eAAC+ & WMA

Video:

  • Hi-Resolution VGA, 30fps Video Recording
  • Supported formats: MP4, 3GPP, H.264 & Divx
  • Camera 2 MP
  • Video recorder with Half-VGA resolution

Connectivity:

  • WiFi (IEEE 802.11g)
  • GPS
  • Stereo Bluetooth 2.0 (A2DP)
  • miniUSB
  • 3.5mm headphone jack

Messaging:

  • SMS
  • MMS (with video)
  • E-mail (POP3, SMTP, IMAP4, BES, BIS)

Hardware:

Design:
I’m not sure what it is about the Bold, but the aesthetics of the thing are amazing. I was very hesitant upon hearing that they put (p)leather on its rear instead of a rubberized paint job, but all those reservations are gone. The feel of the phone in the hand is amazing. It does not feel like a brick like my last phone did, which was the AT&T Tilt, and feels slick, smooth and thin. The leather backside gives me no hesitation of using it one-handed; It is perfect for one-handed (fits well for any lefty or righty) use, when you just don’t have access to the other hand. The chrome finish that rounds it out makes it stand out as the high end device that it is. Needless to say, it has both the professional look that one would expect a BlackBerry would have, but yet a stylus look to it as well.

Screen:
HVGA, 480 x 320
The screen has the exact same resolution of that famous touch screen phone, but on about a third the screen size. In short, the screen is gorgeous and is hands down the best screen on any smartphone I have every used.

Keyboard:
I have been using a QWERTY device for about a year now and can’t think of any other way to use a phone. The keyboard on the Bold is quite spectacular. Although it took me sometime to get used to the shorter spacing between the keys, but I anticipated this, it wasn’t long before I was pounding away at the thing in lightning quick speeds. Keyboard is utterly the best thing about this device, which is saying a lot being this smartphone has a lot of things going for it.

Call Quality:
I’ve had four phones in my entire lifetime and I would have to say hands down this sounds the best out of the four even on the crappiness that is AT&T’s network. I don’t make much calls on this thing, but everyone came in clear and I have had no drop calls. Although I do notice that it sometimes gets stuck on EDGE when I am 100% sure that I am in a 3G area. Not sure why this is, but I had the same problems with the Tilt, so I am attributing this to AT&T’s network, which for the most part could be much better.

Software:
This is where the BlackBerry stands above all other devices. It does not have the same plethora of software as other devices, but it makes up for it on the quality of the applications and the speed of execution. Everything is instantaneous, when I click on an icon for say Gtalk, it brings it up right away and signs me in so I can begin to chat. It is one of the problems that I had with the Tilt, applications on that thing would sometimes freeze and lock up for seemingly no reason. On the Bold it is a whole ‘nother story, no waiting minutes for an application to load, it just goes. However, I have had the ocassional lock up, but I am attributing that because some applications have not been optimized for BB OS 4.6, since this is the first phone to get that OS or for the screen res, which is the first BlackBerry to get such a high screen res, well at least until the Storm hits stores.

Contacts:
Contacts management is far superior than any other smartphone I have used. Adding one is simple and easy and the SIM contact transfer is easy to use.

Messaging:

SMS:
This is actually one of the low points of the device for me. I don’t know what it is, possibly the extreme hype I got from everywhere, but it is just a letdown. All I want for this is threaded SMS, where each message is marked for each sender and receiver, all the messages are marked with is a date and time stamp and is group by exchanging contact. I mean the choice of different colors would have made this ten folds better.

IM:
This is the most connected I have every been on a mobile device. I can connect to people with multiple options with the only exclusion is IRC, but that would be crazy on a mobile device. AT&T has now made the service books available for ICQ and AIM to round out the support for the existing BlackBerry Messenger, Gtalk, Yahoo and Windows Live (MSN). All integrated extremely well and has a natural application feel, although I feel some slight lag, but that is probably due to AT&T’s network.

Email:
RIM is supposed to be number one in this area and I would have to say that it still is with the push email, but it does not automatically sync with the email services that I use, which is mainly gmail like IMAP, which is a total letdown.

Web Browsing:
I came from Pocket IE (the broken interwebs) and Opera Mini (much improved fast web browser) as well as Opera Mobile and Firefox on my N800, so I have quite a bit of experience with web browser. The browser called Browser is not so bad, but I can’t say that it is great either. First off, you have three browsers in total, one for Media Net for AT&T (which I kinda think may just be a shortcut to Media Net, I’m not 100% sure), one for WiFi and then the regular browser. I have no clue why there wasn’t just one browser for all connectivity options, but regardless, websites are rendered pretty well and (if you have javascript turned off) webpages are rendered pretty quickly. However, some websites had enormously terrible loads times on non-mobile versions of certain websites, i.e. Engadget. The only saving grace is that there is a mobile version. I have not tested it much on WiFi since I have an unlimited data plan and live in a major city where 3G is just about everywhere.

Multimedia:
The Bold has a pretty decent media player, not the best, but it is pretty decent. One thing that it needs is to show songs on the playlist using ID3 tags instead of the filename, otherwise the music player is great. Sounds decent as well, not 2nd gen iPod or my Squeezebox Boom quality, but it is listenable, only wish that the lowest volume could be lower. The Bold also supports a wide range of codecs as well, I have yet to test anything other than MP3 in the audio category, but in the video it did not play a few out-of-box, only audio came out of some video files. I would also like to see the ability to bookmark a long podcast or a movie.

Applications:
For what the Bold does not have out-of-box, you can probably find an application that does what you like. Just head over to mobile.blackberry.com on your Bold. What it is lacking is a mobile application store built on the phone like that other (i)Phone, but that will be coming in March 2009, since the usability is pretty horrible for downloading applications, which is handled by the web browser or connecting your Bold to your computer which has to have the BlackBerry Desktop software installed first.

Navigation:
The Bold for AT&T comes pre-loaded with TeleNav to replace BlackBerry maps, since I haven’t used either I can’t comment, but I did promptly install Google Maps. Works pretty well, takes a little while getting a fix though, but generally I am much happier with the GPS on this thing than I was with the Tilt where I had to open two programs to use the GPS, which would then may or may not work. As a note, you cannot install BlackBerry Maps on this thing because I am assuming AT&T has prevented it, but I feel if you hacked some of the service books you would probably be able to.

Camera:
I do not take pictures very often, but when I do I have my Canon PowerShot for that, but I have taken a few shots and it is nothing to scream about, but it works and has an LED flash, which is a definite plus. Pictures look decent.

WiFi:
As I wrote earlier, I have not used the WiFi very often, but I was able to connect to my apartment’s Linksys router I setup with no problem and was able to view other Access Points with ease and supports just about all the security protocols, even the now only unhackable WPA2-PSK.

Bluetooth:
Haven’t used this feature yet, can’t comment, but I will update once I do.

Pros:

  • Awesome keyboard.
  • Fast, fast, and… fast
  • Beautiful Screen
  • Beautiful Aesthetics
  • Contacts management
  • Wide Range of reliable applications

Cons:

  • Email, although it pushes, is not IMAP and doesn’t sync automatically
  • SMS could be managed better
  • Not RIM’s fault, but AT&T sucks
  • Addicting as heck

Conclusion:
This review has generally been glowing, there was no deal breaker in any of the downsides. The screen is gorgeous, fantastic keyboard, great contacts management, voice sounds good, messaging is good and the amazing amount of stable applications I have used and installed makes me so connected that it kinda scares me. If I were to give this a rating on a 10-point scale with 10 being amazing-awesome-can’t put down and a zero being do-not-even-go-near, I would give this a 9 out of 10, almost perfect.

Links to other Reviews:

I have had the Squeezebox Boom for about two weeks and I think it is time to post the review. After using this thing for two weeks, I have to say that I am quite impressed with it.

For those who are asking, what exactly is the Squeezebox Boom. Well, in short, it is an audio streaming device. What is does is it takes audio from a variety of sources, computers, mp3 players, and the key feature from different online services and sources. What sets the Squeezebox Boom from it’s predecessors is that it integrates a speakers into the unit, making it more akin to those old boom boxes back in the day, hence the name “Boom”. The Boom competes directly with the Roku Soundbridge Radio. Both offer similar functionality and are at the same price point.

There were only seven things included in the box of the Squeezebox Boom, a 2-way 3.5 mm cable for connecting mp3 players and what not, a small remote with a magnetic back, a thin instruction manual, a/c brick, corresponding region plug, the Squeezebox Boom and a nice velvety pouch for the Boom. After taking the obligatory unboxing pictures and peeling off the plastic on the screen I dove right in and turned the Boom on. After signing up for the SqueezeNetwork account and configuring my wireless network settings I was on my way. I added as many of the free services as possible that are quite a large list, from Live365, Pandora, SIRIUS, Last.fm RadioTime and a few others. You can take a look at the list here. The first services I tested was Pandora and it was upon adding the service, my account, almost instantaneously, showed up on my Boom and I proceeded to select my favorite station and played with no lag on my bottom of the barrel DSL connection.

Hardware:
While I’m not an audiophile, the Boom sounded amazing, sounds were crisp, bass was boomy and I did the ultimate test to all the audio devices I get, I turned it up as loud as possible to see if I hear crackling and popping and I heard none. I was quite impressed with the thing and it hadn’t even been 10 minutes. For the next few hours I was playing and tweaking the devices and seeing all the options. The Boom performed extremely well, but I could see it hiccup a few times and it seemed to stall on longer “tracks” in my case long podcasts that I listened to and required a “soft reset” (which was me holding the power button), but I feel that this was due to my network connection. My network connection back in my apartment is a bit faster and works like a charm with this thing and I have had no hiccups.

The remote is pretty basic and emulates all the controls that are on the face of the player in a very small package. The remote backing is also magnetic, so if you ever need to put the remote away, just stick it to the top of the Boom or in my case my metal lamp. This is the first remote that I can honestly say I will never lose.

Software
The software is extremely customizable. Most anything you want to do with the Boom, it has been implemented, if your looking of ways to extend the functionality of the Boom, there is a decent size development community coding up their own plugins to extend the Boom’s already large feature set. The software is comprised of two different divisions, the Squeeze Center and the Squeeze Network. As a little walkthrough for the goings on of the Boom. Upon powering up the device, it automatically tries to connect to the last connection you last used, either it be the Squeeze Network or the respective Squeeze Center that you set it up with.

SqueezeNetwork
The Squeeze Network is an online website that you can actively manage your Squeezebox. There you can setup all the different music services you want, add all the podcast feeds you want, manage a multitude of settings including the alarm clock, display text, visualizations and what not. You can even remotely control the Boom from the website, it has a bunch of nifty features that will surprise the most customizer in you. In short, the amount of customizability in the Boom is bountiful and will satisfy your average consumer. But if you want the ability to do even more things with the Boom, like to connect it to multiple computers, then installing the SqueezeCenter software is the way to go.

SqueezeCenter:
The SqueezeCenter software allows you to customize the Boom to no end. Great thing about the SqueezeCenter is that you do not need to be connected to the Internet to listen to your music and away from your computer, once installed and setup with the right directories to scan for music, you can control it all from the Boom. It is open source and is available to just about all the platforms you can think of, be it a Linux box, an Apple Mac or a Windows machine. It plays well with all platforms, which is a great thing. Now, what else can this add, do you ask? Well how about the ability to stream BBC radio to your Boom? Or how about bookmarking that podcast you were listen to that you just couldn’t finish in one sitting? How about play Tetris, that’s right that Tetris? Or for you stats fans, diagnostics tools or even custom builds of the SqeezeCenter software for a multitude of devices. Check out more plugins here.

As a note: The Squeezebox Boom has had to be updated the firmware frequently. I think this is due to the fact that I am running 7.2 on my computer and Slim pushed out 7.2.1 on the Boom over the SqueezeNetwork and when I switch back and forth it has to change firmwares to match the one you are using. I am not 100% sure, but I will see if it goes away once I update the software on my computer.

SoftSqueeze
At this moment I’ve used the softsqueeze software only sparingly, but I think it is worth a mention. It emulates the Squeezebox Boom on your desktop with a Java app. It is pretty cool and can turn your computer into a Squeezebox device, it isn’t available for everyone to download, however. I am not certain of whether or not you need a Slim Devices product for it to work, but I am assuming that you do not.

Pros:

  • Amazing sound from a small device.
  • Aesthetics are pretty noteworthy.
  • Software, both the SqueezeCenter and SqueezeNetwork and the on device firmware fully customizable.

Cons:

  • High price point, means high point of entry

Conclusion:

I have never in my life been 100% satisfied with an electronics purchase, but with the Squeezebox Boom, I come pretty darn close. It has very few bugs, which is attributed to the fact of Slim Devices producing this type of device for years, as well as the openness of it’s SqueezeCenter software. This device both looks and sound amazing. The only thing that holds this player back is the high price point. Some people do not feel that an audio player warrants this type of device, especially with the economy at the state that it is.